KIMI PECK DUPES ANOTHER UNSUSPECTING ANIMAL LOVER

Kimi Peck hides her, what many people believe, hoarding addiction behind websites that paint a picture of a wonderful rescuer with a beautiful ‘sanctuary’. Here’s another victim duped by Ms. Peck’s websites and lies.

Women spar over puppies Story Updated: Nov 12, 2009 at 12:20 PM PST By Carol Ferguson, Eyewitness News Video BEAR VALLEY SPRINGS, Calif. — An angry woman wants two puppies back from the animal rescue run by Kimi Peck. Julie Feiner went to Peck’s facility near Bear Valley Springs this week, but Peck called police and refused to give up the dogs. Feiner said she turned over the tiny puppies to a Chihuahua rescue volunteer this spring. She said the agreement was the rescue would let the puppies nurse with a mother dog, and she could have them back when they were weaned. Feiner said the rescue went back on that agreement. Peck said she didn’t know about this agreement. Feiner said she tried repeatedly to call the volunteer. At first, the volunteer said the puppies were fine, then when Feiner wanted them back, her calls were not returned. She eventually got a call through to Peck. But she couldn’t get the dogs back, so she went to the rescue. When Feiner got there Tuesday morning, several young workers were outside the house and warehouse on Bear Valley Road. They were waiting for Peck to return and unlock the doors. One girl reached another worker by phone, and they apparently forwarded a message to Peck, who then called police. Peck came back to the house, along with an officer from the Stallion Springs Police Department and Kern County Sheriff’s Department. The officers got statements from Feiner but said the situation was a "civil matter." Feiner insisted she had an agreement to get the puppies back, when she took them to a shopping center in Santa Clarita and handed them over to the volunteer. "I gave her two puppies from a litter that my mom had," Feiner said. "Under the agreement, I gave her $200 so that they could nurse off a lactating female dog." Feiner said she’d call the volunteer every couple weeks and got details about the puppy and the foster mother dog. After a couple months, she thought it was time to get the puppies back, but the volunteer stopped returning her calls. Then she got a call through to Peck. "She said, ‘If you give me $3,000, you can have the puppies, if you give me $3,000,’" Feiner said. When Peck returned to the rescue facility with the officers, she refused to talk to Feiner and insisted she leave the property. Asked if she would return the puppies, Peck said no. "It’ll be a cold day in hell before I turn over two healthy, innocent puppies to somebody who killed the mother," Peck said. "It’s not going to happen." Feiner said it was her 73-year-old mother whose 9-year-old Chihuahua had the litter this spring, and it died soon after the puppies were born. Feiner called her mother an "irresponsible" pet owner, and that’s why she removed the two surviving puppies. Feiner said she asked the volunteer to call her elderly mother and "lecture" her about the situation. But, Peck doesn’t believe that. "We get all sorts of stories, we never get the truth from these people," she said. She called Feiner a "stalker" because she continually tried to call the rescue volunteer. Eyewitness News called the volunteer to ask about the number of contacts by Feiner, but there’s been no response by the volunteer so far. Peck brought out the tiny, gray Chihuahua puppies after she made Feiner leave the property. Peck said she personally bottle-fed the tiny puppies for weeks. Feiner wonders about the nursing mother dog she was promised. Peck said the dogs needed medical care, and she provided that, too. And, did Peck at one point say Feiner could get the dogs back, if she paid the vet bill? "I was making a point," Peck told Eyewitness News. "It was rhetorical." Feiner had looked around the house and warehouse at the rescue, and she was not satisfied with what she saw. "All I see are empty bowls down there," she said, pointing to the warehouse. "I don’t see any water bowls." The girls who had arrived to work at the facility defended the conditions at the rescue, saying the dogs were well cared for and insisting some animals had been taken to the Los Angeles area to be adopted out. Feiner said she had given the puppies to Chihuahua Rescue, impressed by its Web site. But, she’s seen more reports on Web sites that worry her. "I did all this research about her," Feiner said. "Horrific facilities, and what she puts them all through." Peck countered that those reports are lies. Peck did have her rescue facility with nearly 200 dogs in a large home in Tehachapi for a couple years, until Kern County Supervisors ordered her to move from that site or get a permit. They ruled the operation violated zoning laws in that location. That was February. By June, Peck had moved herself and the dogs into the property on Bear Valley Road. It’s the same home where accused animal hoarder Cynthia Gudger was found with dozens of animals in filthy conditions in July 2008. Peck said an adoptive home has been lined up for the chihuahua puppies. "The dogs have a wonderful home already," Peck said. "They’re just waiting to be spayed and neutered. When my vet says they’re big enough, then that will be done." But, Feiner doesn’t believe that. She’s convinced Peck will keep the puppies. Feiner said she’s looking for an attorney who can help her get the puppies back.

KIMI PECK’S MANY NEGATIVE NEWS STORIES AS A ‘RESCUER’…SHE STILL HAS A FEW SUPPORTERS…

We have been working very hard to help the animals in Kimi Peck’s ‘care’. Many people are now seeing and understanding the reality of ‘rescuer’ Kimi Peck’s ‘sanctuary’. Here are just a few of the ‘HEADLINERS’ pertaining to ‘rescuer’ or, as many of us see her, HOARDER, Kimi Peck: -Fine line between disgusting, criminal animal caretaking -County official says Kern woman has an illegal animal shelter -Tehachapi woman living with 200 dogs faces action by the county -Dog fight brewing in Tehachapi -How many dogs is too many -County seeks to shut Tehachapi home with 170 dogs -Neighbor files for restraining order against Tehachapi dog rescuer -Tehachapi woman, 200 dogs face foreclosure -Local animal rescuer again in legal trouble

Hoardingchihuahuas HAS Contacted MANY MANY Animal Rights Groups About Kimi Peck

First, thank you all for visiting our site. In response to many e-mails, please understand that we, former volunteers and others of Kimi Peck, HAVE contacted many animal rights groups including, ASPCA, HSUS (Humane Society of the United States) and PETA. Neither has stepped up to the plate to help as a matter of fact, HSUS and ASPCA have continually IGNORED our pleas for their help and others pleas for help since 2005. We have spent much of our time and money exposing Kimi Peck for one reason only, TO HELP THE ANIMALS IN HER CARE and to expose a possible animal hoarder. In addition, Kern County officials have also ignored MANY MANY complaints from Kimi Peck’s former concerned Tehachapi neighbors and people who have worked for Kimi in Tehachapi for five (5) years. With that said, we appreciate your positive feedback and for your concern about her animals. We encourage all to write letters to Kern County Animal Control, too, in addition to the other animal rights organizations. Do expect, however, that Kern County officials will continue to ignore your complaints because the few times they do inspections, they give her notice and the inspections are conducted under Kimi Peck’s terms. Kern County animal control, as we mentioned, claim that Ms. Peck’s hundreds of animals are ‘well cared for’ (even though she’s been behind on licenses) and former Kern County Animal Control ‘big shot’, Denise Haynes, has even had lunch with ‘rescuer’ Kimi Peck. Denise Haynes has said that all of Kimi Peck’s charges and convictions in criminal court are just ‘HERE SAY’.

Kimi Peck in Trouble AGAIN…Her Latest ‘Sanctuary’ Faces Foreclosure and Peck Is Begging the Public to Bail Her Out

Yes, again, ‘rescuer’ Peck will have to move her ‘sanctuary’ of over 200 animals. She continues to blame the world for her negligence; however, she asks the world to bail her out, anyway. She wants YOU to buy the property for her. What she continues NOT to tell the world is that she has been legally forced to close many ‘sanctuaries’. Was legally forced out of Los Angeles and is on their Do Not Adopt List. Has many charges and convictions stemming from her ‘rescuing’ efforts. And, well, in many people’s opinion is an animal hoarder.

Tehachapi woman, 200 dogs face foreclosure Last Update: 8:20 am A Tehachapi woman living with more than 200 dogs may be forced to move again. Kimi Peck moved into a home on 20 acres in Cummings Valley, once occupied by accused animal hoarder Anita Gilbert. Now the property has fallen into foreclosure. It was set to be auctioned Monday morning on the steps of Bakersfield City Hall. "Well, I knew it was coming,” Peck said. ”I just didn’t know how soon. That’s just how my life is these days.” "Let’s just hope someone steps up and helps. Let’s hope somebody gives a damn about these animals." The home auction has been delayed until Dec. 2, giving Peck and her helpers one month of additional breathing room. "I think it’s all lies," said 20-year-old dog helper Brandi Linch. "If she were a hoarder I would not be here." Peck’s accountant, Susan Marlowe, bought the home years ago and Peck says she was supposed to move in before Gudger got there. "The next thing I know she moves this woman, whose real name I don’t know, with a lot of cats," Peck said. "So that eliminated the possibility of me moving over here." Peck’s trouble began while living on a nearby, 23-acre Tehachapi home where neighbors complained of wafting smells and loud barking. Code compliance officers inspected the home and determined Peck needed a conditional use permit that would qualify her for running a kennel on the property. Peck failed to meet a compliance deadline to obtain the permit and county supervisors fined her $5,000 in March. Peck said she ran onto financial hard times and was unable to make mortgage payments, sending her to the home owned by Marlowe. Peck blames the controversy swirling around her on Marlowe’s ex-husband, Los Angeles real estate developer Michael Goland, who Peck says is trying to sabotage her dog-rescuing efforts. It’s a claim Goland adamantly denied in a telephone interview in June. But Peck’s problems with the county continue. Animal Control officials fined her for failing to license and vaccinate the 200 dogs living with her. Peck said she welcomed the tickets because she wants to take her battle to court. "I hope this whole county is happy with what they have done to a well-meaning, wonderful individual who gave up her life to help a bunch of dogs that nobody wanted," Peck said. "That’s the bottom line."

Kimi Peck is again in LEGAL TROUBLE…NBC BAKERSFIELD

Local animal rescuer again in legal trouble Last Update: 10/16 8:43 pm Animal rescuer Kimi Peck is once again in trouble with the law. It’s the latest chapter in a longstanding battle with animal control, and neighbors of Peck, who say she is hoarding dogs in deplorable conditions. Since 2008, Peck has faced numerous county code compliance and animal control mandates. On Wednesday, she was fined for failing to license and vaccinate dogs 200 dogs on her Tehachapi property. Animal control officers say they had been asking Peck to comply for more than 6-months. But Peck told animal control officers it would cost too much money for her to vaccinate the animals, and failed to follow their orders. Guy Shaw with Kern County Animal Control says this was a last resort. "This isn’t like a fix it ticket or an infraction this is where you’ll have to appear for an arraignment in Mojave and it’s a misdemeanor it’s a little more serious than infractions." Shaw says Peck has also been asked to convert her property into a kennel, which would not require her to pay for licenses and vaccinations. But Shaw says Peck hasn’t done that either. Kimi Peck is set to appear in a Mojave courtroom in December.

Susan Marlowe – MORE FRAUD – using "L. OTTO??????

Hoarding Chihuahuas obtained official paperwork regarding a quick deed on Susan Marlowe’s Tehachapi property (the one where she was harboring Cynthia Gudger and where Kimi Peck is now living and operating a kennel without the proper permits). The Deed (available in the Gallery section next week) states that Susan Marlowe is sharing the property with her ‘mother’, L. Otto. L. Otto is NOT Susan Marlowe’s mother but a woman in her 80’s who is living in Northern California in a nursing home. We also know that Ms. Otto was convicted of animal cruelty in Riverside (this seems to attract Susan Marlowe) and was supposedly running a non-profit rescue called TO LOVE CATS up until about six (6) months ago…

THE DOG ANGELS SANCTUARY ACTUALLY A SANCTUARY? CHIHUAHUA RESCUE A SANCTUARY?

Kimi Peck and Susan Marlowe work very hard in making the public believe they are reputable rescuers operating a legitimate ‘sanctuary’. They do this because they count on donations and grants to pay all bills, according to their tax returns, relating to Ms. Peck’s expenses in Kern County (including her personal mortgage). They refer to themselves as ‘The Dog Angels Sanctuary’ aka ‘The Dog Angels’ aka ‘Chihuahua Rescue’ aka ‘Chihuahua Rescue LA’ aka ‘KimiPeck.org’…and the list goes on and on and on…

THESE ARE ALL THE SAME PLACE JUST USING DIFFERENT NAMES . These people are continuing to "morph" their rescue name in an apparent attempt to distance themselves from their documented past charges and convictions in Los Angeles’ criminal courts under Kimi Peck and Kimi Peck’s "Chihuahua Rescue". (see citations in citation section of this website) Before donating to any rescue please do your homework. 1. Please visit before donating. We cannot stress this enough. Disreputable rescues will invite you to their facility to make you believe that they have nothing to hide but in truth trying to get in would be very difficult. Often these places only invite people in when they have a scheduled inspection that they spend many days, even weeks, preparing for, including moving animals from site. A compelling website does not insure a healthy facility. It is only a website. If the website has no documentation to back up their words, that’s a red flag. This website, for example, has documentation obtained from the Courts, pictures and official documentation to back up our FACTS. 2. Be sure that the 501c3 also has the necessary license to operate . NO EXCUSES 3. Please visit PETABUSE.com to see if the operators are listed. It’s very easy to check this. 4. Please search the internet for information regarding the rescue you are considering donating to. Often "animal hoarders" pose as rescuers.Having a 501c3 does not rule this possibility out. It’s very easy to obtain a 501(c)3 non-profit status (just ask Susan Marlowe, CPA, she was able to obtain one for a fugitive) 5. Beware of "rescuers" that complain that they are victims and they don’t know why people are trying to destroy them. This is a huge red flag. Neighbors, former volunteers and city officials that address the animals poor living conditions are harrassed in an attempt to shift the focus from the horrible conditions the animals are forced to live in. 6. Research how often the rescue you are considering donating to has relocated and why they have relocated. This is often a sign of a problem. 7. Find out how many addresses and rescue names a group operates under. If it looks like a shell game it probably is. Donating to a rescue that does not properly care for their animals only continues the suffering of animals in their care.

Is Kimi Peck Following Land Use Rules in her new "Sanctuary"???? DOES NOT LOOK LIKE IT

Why doesn’t Kimi Peck just follow the rules? Why does she give animal rights activists more and more proof to back up many statements that Ms. Peck continues to fit the description of an ANIMAL HOARDER? Reputable rescuers do not move onto a property with their ‘rescue’ animals, especially when they are operating a non-profit, without first making sure they have the proper licenses to operate a legit kennel. Why does Kern County Animal continue just sit back and do nothing? Bakersfield Californian, James Burger, writes this in his latest article:

Animal rescuer moves, but is she following land use rules? BY JAMES BURGER, Californian staff writer jburger@bakersfield.com | Thursday, Jun 25 2009 04:53 PM Last Updated Thursday, Jun 25 2009 04:53 PM HOT TOPICS: Tehachapi chihuahua rescuer Kimi Peck has moved her animals onto the property once inhabited by accused animal abuser Cynthia Gudger. Peck had until Tuesday to remove about 200 dogs she was keeping in a home on Water Canyon Road in the hill south of Tehachapi under a ruling from the Kern County Board of Supervisors that determined her animal shelter was in violation of county zoning ordinances. But it appears she’s only moved into another home where her shelter is illegal under those same land use rules. Kern County Animal Control Director Guy Shaw said Peck has told him she will likely stay on the Bear Valley Road property for only a short time. "She had told me she’s moving out of the county. She told me that she bought a piece of property but escrow won’t close until August," he said. The property is owned by Susan Marlowe, Peck’s accountant. But according to legal documents, Marlowe is in default on the loan she took out to buy the land. A trustee’s sale was scheduled for March but no sale of the property has been recorded. The home and warehouse sit just outside the exclusive community of Bear Valley Springs. The location became a refuge for Gudger, who went by the alias Anita Gilbert in Tehachapi, after she fled Riverside County just before she was arrested on animal cruelty charges there. Riverside animal control officers released animals they had seized from Gudger to Marlowe. The animals, and the carry-cases with Riverside animal control markings, were found in a warehouse on Marlowe’s property when Kern County Animal Control raided the property and arrested Gudger in July. County Supervisor Don Maben, who represents Tehachapi, said Peck needs to keep her nose clean on Bear Valley Road. "If she takes care of her animals, and keeps it clean and there are no neighbor complaints, she may have found her place," Maben said. According to Kern County mapping records, the Bear Valley Road property is zoned agricultural. County ordinances require operators of an animal shelter to obtain a conditional use permit to begin operating an animal shelter in an agricultural zone, said county Planning Department Director Ted James. Supervisors ruled that Peck was running a shelter on Water Canyon Road, so it appears Peck is in violation of county zoning laws on the Bear Valley Road site as well. "She knows better than that," James said.